Abstract
DynaFlow enables adaptive multi-agent collaboration by letting a main agent synthesize executable workflows that coordinate sub-agents through structured execution and verification.
Multi-agent systems often rely on predefined collaboration structures, limiting their ability to adapt to diverse task requirements. We introduce DynaFlow, a framework that integrates free-form executable workflow synthesis into the action space of the main agent. The agent decides when collaboration is needed and generates task-specific programs that coordinate sub-agents through sequential or parallel execution, structured information exchange, and verification. Execution results and traces inform subsequent actions, enabling the agent to adapt collaboration as reasoning progresses. We train only the main agent through supervised fine-tuning on distilled trajectories, followed by refinement on examples filtered for unsupported premises, biased verification, and information-flow defects. All sub-agents remain fixed, separating orchestration learning from executor capability improvement. Across six benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, scientific question answering, and multi-hop retrieval, DynaFlow achieves 88.08% overall accuracy in Forced mode, outperforming the strongest evaluated baseline by 10.90 percentage points with the same Qwen3.5-27B backbone. Workflow analysis finds more explicit use, verification, and refinement of upstream outputs after training, highlighting cross-stage information flow as a key dimension of multi-agent orchestration.
Community
GitHub: https://github.com/amiya-special/Dynaflow
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34467
Project Page: https://amiya-special.github.io/DynaFlow-website
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- MAS-Gate: Unlocking Multi-Agent System Lifecycle via Node-Centric Quantification (2026)
- HTN-Orchestrate: A Hierarchical Task Network Framework for Multi-Agent Orchestration (2026)
- Inference-Time Graph Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows (2026)
- RSIFlow: Adaptive Self-Improvement Workflows with an Evolving Meta-Agent (2026)
- RoleFlow: Self-Evolving Multi-Role Agentic Collaboration via Structural Adaptation (2026)
- Inherit-MAS: Test-Time Evolution of Multi-Agent Systems through Workflow and Execution Inheritance (2026)
- OOPMAS: Object-Oriented Multi-Agent Systems for Query-Level Workflow Generation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Dynamic answers 47.1% of questions directly and uses about 41% fewer sub-agent calls, with only a 0.14-point overall gap to Forced. To test the routing decision itself, could you show a 2x2 counterfactual? Split prompts by the path Dynamic chose, then score both direct-only and forced-workflow execution on each subset. That would reveal the cost of unnecessary delegation and of skipping a workflow when it would help.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper