Daily Papers

Hard negatives are essential for training effective retrieval models. Hard-negative mining typically relies on ranking documents using cross-encoders or static embedding models based on similarity metrics such as cosine distance. Hard negative mining becomes challenging for biomedical and scientific domains due to the difficulty in distinguishing between source and hard negative documents. However, referenced documents naturally share contextual relevance with the source document but are not duplicates, making them well-suited as hard negatives. In this work, we propose BiCA: Biomedical Dense Retrieval with Citation-Aware Hard Negatives, an approach for hard-negative mining by utilizing citation links in 20,000 PubMed articles for improving a domain-specific small dense retriever. We fine-tune the GTE_small and GTE_Base models using these citation-informed negatives and observe consistent improvements in zero-shot dense retrieval using nDCG@10 for both in-domain and out-of-domain tasks on BEIR and outperform baselines on long-tailed topics in LoTTE using Success@5. Our findings highlight the potential of leveraging document link structure to generate highly informative negatives, enabling state-of-the-art performance with minimal fine-tuning and demonstrating a path towards highly data-efficient domain adaptation.

How small can a competitive multilingual retrieval model be? We present Bekko Embedding: its smallest model, bekko-embedding-v1-a8m, has just under 8M Active Parameters (AP) -- the non-embedding parameters that dominate inference compute -- yet on official MMTEB Multilingual v2 Retrieval (nDCG@10) it scores 56.2, above the multilingual-e5 family and BGE-M3 (40x the AP) in our comparison. The higher-quality bekko-embedding-v1-a25m (just under 25M AP) reaches 57.5, on par with gte-multilingual-base, and Multilingual NanoBEIR (14 languages) confirms the trend. Both models handle inputs of up to 8192 tokens, and on long-input retrieval (NanoLongEmbed) a25m is the strongest dense model in our comparison. The recipe is deliberately simple. We prune the 22-layer multilingual encoder mmBERT-small to 4 / 13 layers and train the pruned models in two stages -- large-scale contrastive learning on about 1.1 billion multilingual pairs from our public corpus, followed by hard-negative fine-tuning with 8192-token long-document negatives -- with a masked contrastive loss whose direction depends on pair type, plus the Matryoshka objective. No teacher distillation is used, and all training completes on a single GPU in about 3 days for a8m. Small AP pays off directly in speed: among the compared models measured under identical conditions, a8m is the fastest on both CPU and GPU -- 1.6x multilingual-e5-small on x86 CPU -- and the fastest on a Raspberry Pi 5. The 384-dimensional output (truncatable to 256/128/64) keeps similarity search and indexing cheap, and row-wise int8 quantization of the vocabulary embedding shrinks the a8m ONNX / OpenVINO build to 124 MiB, which runs in the browser via Transformers.js. To support reproducible research, we release the model weights, the complete stage-1 corpus, and the independently mined stage-2 hard negatives.

RAG-based question-answering (QA) in specialist domains faces a cold-start problem: lack of evaluative benchmarks and absence of labeled data for post-training. We present DoRA (Domain-oriented RAG Assessment), a novel benchmark construction and evaluation framework using only a small set of specialist domain documents. DoRA systematically generates synthetic QA training and evaluation datasets with auditable evidence across five domain-specific intents. To mitigate same-pipeline circularity, DoRA's training and test splits use different LLM families (Claude Sonnet for training; GPT-4o for test) drawn from disjoint seed-document corpora. Instantiated on 40 defense-related documents (written in English), DoRA yields ~6.6K curated instances. Compared against 8 LLM baselines over a benchmark of 1,259 samples, a LoRA-adapted Llama3.1-8B trained on the synthetic training set consistently improves performance over 6 coverage and faithfulness metrics, especially reducing hallucination by more than half under the default GTE retrieval setting, with gains persisting across alternative retrievers and prompting-based baselines. Defense-domain expertise is incorporated in three stages of our evaluation: (a) determining the quality of the synthetic QA generated by DoRA, (b) ascertaining the reliability of LLM-as-judge scores, and (c) evaluating the generalization of the QA pipeline on completely human-written QA examples. We position DoRA as a practical framework for specialist-domain RAG under domain shift, with defense as a high-stakes case study.

Deep research agents have emerged as powerful systems for addressing complex queries. Meanwhile, LLM-based retrievers have demonstrated strong capability in following instructions or reasoning. This raises a critical question: can LLM-based retrievers effectively contribute to deep research agent workflows? To investigate this, we introduce SAGE, a benchmark for scientific literature retrieval comprising 1,200 queries across four scientific domains, with a 200,000 paper retrieval corpus.We evaluate six deep research agents and find that all systems struggle with reasoning-intensive retrieval. Using DR Tulu as backbone, we further compare BM25 and LLM-based retrievers (i.e., ReasonIR and gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct) as alternative search tools. Surprisingly, BM25 significantly outperforms LLM-based retrievers by approximately 30%, as existing agents generate keyword-oriented sub-queries. To improve performance, we propose a corpus-level test-time scaling framework that uses LLMs to augment documents with metadata and keywords, making retrieval easier for off-the-shelf retrievers. This yields 8% and 2% gains on short-form and open-ended questions, respectively.

Current state-of-the-art multi-vector models are obtained through a small Knowledge Distillation (KD) training step on top of strong single-vector models, leveraging the large-scale pre-training of these models. In this paper, we study the pre-training of multi-vector models and show that large-scale multi-vector pre-training yields much stronger multi-vector models. Notably, a fully ColBERT-pre-trained model, ColBERT-Zero, trained only on public data, outperforms GTE-ModernColBERT as well as its base model, GTE-ModernBERT, which leverages closed and much stronger data, setting new state-of-the-art for model this size. We also find that, although performing only a small KD step is not enough to achieve results close to full pre-training, adding a supervised step beforehand allows to achieve much closer performance while skipping the most costly unsupervised phase. Finally, we find that aligning the fine-tuning and pre-training setups is crucial when repurposing existing models. To enable exploration of our results, we release various checkpoints as well as code used to train them.